![]() Moreover, it is apparent that Defendant earns income from services provided in Baltimore City. See Sexton Affidavit, Defense Exhibit #1. This request should fail because Defendant carries on a regular business and habitually engages in his vocation in Baltimore City, Maryland. Vol.), §6-201.ĭefendant seeks a dismissal on the grounds of improper venue. In addition, a corporation also maybe sued where it maintains it principal offices in the state. Subject to the provisions of §§6-202 and 6-203 and unless otherwise provided by law, a civil action shall be brought in a county where the Defendant resides, carries on a regular business, is employed, or habitually engages in a vocation. Section 6-201 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Maryland Code provides as follows: Plaintiffs’ Choice of Venue in Baltimore City is Proper Because Defendant cannot meet their burden of showing that Defendant does not conduct regular business in Baltimore City, his motion to dismiss should be denied.Ī. Accordingly, venue is entirely proper in Baltimore City. at Paragraph 3.ĭefendant engages in the regular business in Baltimore City and earns income from work that he does in Baltimore City. ( See Plaintiff’s Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit 1.) Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant engages in regular business in Maryland, specifically Baltimore City. Sexton (“Sexton”) caused substantial personal injuries property damages. This is an auto accident in which Plaintiff, Hope Vitale (“Vitale”) contends that the negligence of the Defendant, James C. Plaintiff, Hope Vitale, by her undersigned attorneys, respectfully requests that this Court deny Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue. County and Baltimore are the two best jurisdictions for personal injury cases in Maryland
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |